Guessing at SR&ED Time Tracking Can Cost Thousands in Tax Credits
- Alon Sabi
- Jan 31
- 3 min read
Guessing hours is expensive. Reviewers want consistent, contemporaneous evidence not memories. Small gaps compound into big losses.
Make tracking automatic, weekly, and tied to real work signals. Your future self will thank you at claim time.
Key takeaways
Estimates are not evidence. Reviewers want consistent, real-time records.
Tiny misses add up. A few untracked hours per person per week can erase thousands at claim time.
Tie time to artifacts: tickets, commits, PRs, experiments, and failed attempts.
Track weekly, not yearly. Short cycles prevent drift and shrink audit risk.
Automate what you can. Make “claim-ready” the default, not a scramble.

The Cost of “Good Enough” Time Estimates
A lot of R&D teams fall into the bad habit of “reconstructing R&D time” at year-end. You huddle, pull calendars, and backfill spreadsheets.
It feels accurate enough. It isn’t.
Memory is biased. Work scatters across tools. Small undercounts hurt more than you think.
What Reviewers Expect
No matter what R&D Tax Credits you’re filing or reporting (SR&ED and IRAP in Canada), the pattern is the same: show how eligible work was planned, executed, and validated.
That means:
Who worked on what, when?
What uncertainty you tackled?
Which approaches failed, and what you tried next?
Evidence that ties the hours to actual R&D artifacts.
Contemporaneous beats retrospective every time.
Where Teams Go Wrong With SR&ED Time Tracking
Percent guesses: “About 60% of my time was R&D” is not defensible.
Calendar-only: Meetings ≠ R&D. Standups help, but they’re not the work.
Ticket drift: Issues get closed late or not linked to work. Hours vanish.
One giant bucket: Everything “engineering” is not “experimental development.”
Year-end archaeology: Rebuilding a paper trail adds gaps and risk.
A Simple Math Check
Run this for your team:
Missed 2 hours/week of eligible R&D per developer
Team of 6 over 40 weeks
That’s 480 hours untracked
At $80/hour, that’s $38,400 of eligible labour you may fail to support
Even a modest credit scenario leaves thousands on the table and raises audit risk.
Make It Easy to Track (without slowing work)
People avoid time tracking because it feels like admin.
Remove the pain:
Integrate with tools you already use: Jira, Linear, GitHub, GitLab, Asana, Trello. Pull tickets, branches, commits, and PRs.
Auto-suggest hours from signals: Map activity to eligible work streams and let humans approve.
Tag uncertainty and experiments: A simple “R&D” and “Why” tag goes a long way.
Capture failures: Dead ends prove systematic investigation. Keep them.
Short notes, not essays: One-line context on the artifact is enough.
A Weekly Cadence That Sticks
Ten disciplined minutes per week beat ten chaotic days at year-end.
Friday (10 minutes): Engineers confirm suggested hours, add a one-liner.
Tech lead check: Spot anomalies. Are hours tied to the right tickets?
Monthly roll-up: Eligible vs. ineligible time by project.
Quarterly evidence pack: Export summaries with deep links to artifacts.
What “Claim-Ready” Looks Like
Traceability: Ticket > commit/PR > hours > outcome
Context: What uncertainty, what hypothesis, what changed, what you learned
Continuity: Weekly records across the year, not bursts
Consistency: Same tags, same fields, same cadence
Completeness: Include failures, prototypes, and learning that informed production
How SREDify Helps
Auto-capture from your stack: Pulls tickets, branches, commits, and PRs to suggest eligible work.
Weekly prompts: Light approvals instead of heavy reconstruction.
Evidence locker: Centralizes artifacts and notes for SR&ED or IRAP packages.
Consistency by default: Standard tags, fields, and exports reviewers expect.
Closing Thoughts
Time is your leverage. Guessing at it is a leak you don’t need, especially when it comes to SR&ED Time Tracking here in Canada.
Shift from “rebuild later” to “record as you go,” and tie hours to proof the work happened. Keep it weekly. Keep it light. Automate where you can.
If you want claim-ready evidence without slowing the team, try SREDify. We’ll help you integrate your tools, set the weekly cadence, and turn R&D time into money you actually keep.
Questions? Reach out any time.
Comments